1

Closed

Update Argument Structure

description

The current argument structure is based on convention and can get confusing really fast when arguments are optional. We may be converting to using a more named-argument convention instead of placement convention using Mono.Options.
Closed Aug 29, 2010 at 1:46 AM by jpoehls
moved to github

comments

JamesEggers wrote Apr 17, 2010 at 5:50 PM

After looking more into Mono.Options (which is awesome) and the extensibility goals of DNM, there will be some difficulties getting the two to mesh well. With that said though, a modification will be coming to the argument structure.

wrote Aug 29, 2010 at 1:46 AM

wrote Feb 12, 2013 at 8:43 PM

wrote May 14, 2013 at 8:53 AM